paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thermaltake Core G3 vs COUGAR MG120 vs Thermaltake Suppressor F1…

This comparison shows 3 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Thermaltake Core G3 (454 × 140 × 371 mm), COUGAR MG120 (16.3 × 8.27 × 15.8 in) and Thermaltake Suppressor F1 (319 × 260 × 276 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Thermaltake Core G3 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)454 × 140 × 371 mm45.4 × 14.0 × 37.1 cm17.9 × 5.51 × 14.6 in
COUGAR MG120 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)16.3 × 8.27 × 15.8 in41.5 × 21.0 × 40.0 cm16.3 × 8.27 × 15.8 in
Thermaltake Suppressor F1 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)319 × 260 × 276 mm31.9 × 26.0 × 27.6 cm12.6 × 10.2 × 10.9 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Thermaltake Core G3 23.6 litres, COUGAR MG120 34.9 litres, Thermaltake Suppressor F1 22.9 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Thermaltake Core G3 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)23.6 litres
COUGAR MG120 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)34.9 litres1.5×
Thermaltake Suppressor F1 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)22.9 litres

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Thermaltake Suppressor F1.