paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

27" monitor vs ultrawide vs cx 48 vs cx 55 vs 27" portrait size…

This comparison shows 5 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of 27" monitor (14.4 × 2.2 × 24.2 in), ultrawide (14.2 × 4.1 × 32.3 in), cx 48 (24.3 × 1.8 × 42.2 in), cx 55 (29.1 × 1.8 × 48.3 in) and 27" portrait (24.2 × 2.2 × 14.4 in), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
27" monitor14.4 × 2.2 × 24.2 in36.6 × 5.59 × 61.5 cm14.4 × 2.2 × 24.2 in
ultrawide14.2 × 4.1 × 32.3 in36.1 × 10.4 × 82.0 cm14.2 × 4.1 × 32.3 in
cx 4824.3 × 1.8 × 42.2 in61.7 × 4.57 × 107 cm24.3 × 1.8 × 42.2 in
cx 5529.1 × 1.8 × 48.3 in73.9 × 4.57 × 123 cm29.1 × 1.8 × 48.3 in
27" portrait24.2 × 2.2 × 14.4 in61.5 × 5.59 × 36.6 cm24.2 × 2.2 × 14.4 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: 27" monitor 12.6 litres, ultrawide 30.8 litres, cx 48 30.2 litres, cx 55 41.5 litres, 27" portrait 12.6 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
27" monitor12.6 litres1×
ultrawide30.8 litres2.5×
cx 4830.2 litres2.4×
cx 5541.5 litres3.3×
27" portrait12.6 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, 27" monitor.