paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Emalink Pico vs Emalink Nano vs Emalink Maxx vs EmaLink Standard vs…

This comparison shows 6 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Emalink Pico (1.7 × 0.5 × 1.1 in), Emalink Nano (1.6 × 0.5 × 1.2 in), Emalink Maxx (2.2 × 0.7 × 1.6 in), EmaLink Standard (43.0 × 18.0 × 40.0 mm), EmaLink Micro (43.0 × 12.0 × 41.0 mm) and EmaLink XS (retired) (42.0 × 15.0 × 40.0 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Emalink Pico1.7 × 0.5 × 1.1 in4.32 × 1.27 × 2.79 cm1.7 × 0.5 × 1.1 in
Emalink Nano1.6 × 0.5 × 1.2 in4.06 × 1.27 × 3.05 cm1.6 × 0.5 × 1.2 in
Emalink Maxx2.2 × 0.7 × 1.6 in5.59 × 1.78 × 4.06 cm2.2 × 0.7 × 1.6 in
EmaLink Standard43.0 × 18.0 × 40.0 mm4.3 × 1.8 × 4 cm1.69 × 0.71 × 1.57 in
EmaLink Micro43.0 × 12.0 × 41.0 mm4.3 × 1.2 × 4.1 cm1.69 × 0.47 × 1.61 in
EmaLink XS (retired)42.0 × 15.0 × 40.0 mm4.2 × 1.5 × 4 cm1.65 × 0.59 × 1.57 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Emalink Pico 15.3 cm³, Emalink Nano 15.7 cm³, Emalink Maxx 40.4 cm³, EmaLink Standard 31.0 cm³, EmaLink Micro 21.2 cm³, EmaLink XS (retired) 25.2 cm³
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Emalink Pico15.3 cm³1×
Emalink Nano15.7 cm³1×
Emalink Maxx40.4 cm³2.6×
EmaLink Standard31.0 cm³2×
EmaLink Micro21.2 cm³1.4×
EmaLink XS (retired)25.2 cm³1.6×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Emalink Pico.