paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Anker nano vs Pixel vs Faster size comparison

This comparison shows 3 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Anker nano (1.4 × 1 × 3 in), Pixel (154 × 8.2 × 74.0 mm) and Faster (57.0 × 26.0 × 87.0 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Anker nano1.4 × 1 × 3 in3.56 × 2.54 × 7.62 cm1.4 × 1 × 3 in
Pixel154 × 8.2 × 74.0 mm15.4 × 0.82 × 7.4 cm6.06 × 0.32 × 2.91 in
Faster57.0 × 26.0 × 87.0 mm5.7 × 2.6 × 8.7 cm2.24 × 1.02 × 3.43 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Anker nano 68.8 cm³, Pixel 93.4 cm³, Faster 129 cm³
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Anker nano68.8 cm³1×
Pixel93.4 cm³1.4×
Faster129 cm³1.9×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Anker nano.