paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fortress vs midea vs whirlpool vs Sharp vs rasonic size comparison

This comparison shows 5 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of fortress (260 × 360 × 440 mm), midea (280 × 377 × 469 mm), whirlpool (281 × 364 × 483 mm), Sharp (337 × 390 × 468 mm) and rasonic (259 × 340 × 440 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
fortress260 × 360 × 440 mm26.0 × 36.0 × 44.0 cm10.2 × 14.2 × 17.3 in
midea280 × 377 × 469 mm28.0 × 37.7 × 46.9 cm11.0 × 14.8 × 18.5 in
whirlpool281 × 364 × 483 mm28.1 × 36.4 × 48.3 cm11.1 × 14.3 × 19.0 in
Sharp337 × 390 × 468 mm33.7 × 39.0 × 46.8 cm13.3 × 15.4 × 18.4 in
rasonic259 × 340 × 440 mm25.9 × 34.0 × 44.0 cm10.2 × 13.4 × 17.3 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: fortress 41.2 litres, midea 49.5 litres, whirlpool 49.4 litres, Sharp 61.5 litres, rasonic 38.7 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
fortress41.2 litres1.1×
midea49.5 litres1.3×
whirlpool49.4 litres1.3×
Sharp61.5 litres1.6×
rasonic38.7 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, rasonic.