paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fractal design vs Sliger Cerberus vs Sliger Cerberus X vs sandwich…

This comparison shows 5 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of fractal design (530 × 208 × 442 mm), Sliger Cerberus (358 × 172 × 319 mm), Sliger Cerberus X (380 × 172 × 358 mm), sandwich (357 × 155 × 287 mm) and SM570 (357 × 135 × 287 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
fractal design530 × 208 × 442 mm53.0 × 20.8 × 44.2 cm20.8 × 8.17 × 17.4 in
Sliger Cerberus358 × 172 × 319 mm35.8 × 17.2 × 31.9 cm14.1 × 6.77 × 12.6 in
Sliger Cerberus X380 × 172 × 358 mm38.0 × 17.2 × 35.8 cm15.0 × 6.77 × 14.1 in
sandwich357 × 155 × 287 mm35.7 × 15.5 × 28.7 cm14.1 × 6.1 × 11.3 in
SM570357 × 135 × 287 mm35.7 × 13.5 × 28.7 cm14.1 × 5.31 × 11.3 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: fractal design 48.6 litres, Sliger Cerberus 19.6 litres, Sliger Cerberus X 23.4 litres, sandwich 15.9 litres, SM570 13.8 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
fractal design48.6 litres3.5×
Sliger Cerberus19.6 litres1.4×
Sliger Cerberus X23.4 litres1.7×
sandwich15.9 litres1.1×
SM57013.8 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, SM570.