paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mackie MR524 vs JBL LSR305 vs Focal Alpha 50 Evo vs Focal Shape 65…

This comparison shows 5 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Mackie MR524 (282 × 180 × 221 mm), JBL LSR305 (298 × 185 × 251 mm), Focal Alpha 50 Evo (310 × 229 × 239 mm), Focal Shape 65 (355 × 218 × 285 mm) and Kali LP-6 v2 (359 × 222 × 260 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Mackie MR524 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)282 × 180 × 221 mm28.2 × 18.0 × 22.1 cm11.1 × 7.09 × 8.7 in
JBL LSR305298 × 185 × 251 mm29.8 × 18.5 × 25.1 cm11.7 × 7.28 × 9.88 in
Focal Alpha 50 Evo (opens on Amazon in a new tab)310 × 229 × 239 mm31.0 × 22.9 × 23.9 cm12.2 × 9 × 9.4 in
Focal Shape 65 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)355 × 218 × 285 mm35.5 × 21.8 × 28.5 cm14.0 × 8.58 × 11.2 in
Kali LP-6 v2 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)359 × 222 × 260 mm35.9 × 22.2 × 26.0 cm14.1 × 8.74 × 10.2 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Mackie MR524 11.2 litres, JBL LSR305 13.8 litres, Focal Alpha 50 Evo 16.9 litres, Focal Shape 65 22.1 litres, Kali LP-6 v2 20.7 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Mackie MR524 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)11.2 litres1×
JBL LSR30513.8 litres1.2×
Focal Alpha 50 Evo (opens on Amazon in a new tab)16.9 litres1.5×
Focal Shape 65 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)22.1 litres2×
Kali LP-6 v2 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)20.7 litres1.8×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Mackie MR524.