paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R4 vs Compact vs Define C vs Nano size comparison

This comparison shows 4 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of R4 (523 × 232 × 464 mm), Compact (474 × 210 × 427 mm), Define C (440 × 210 × 399 mm) and Nano (400 × 203 × 330 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
R4523 × 232 × 464 mm52.3 × 23.2 × 46.4 cm20.6 × 9.13 × 18.3 in
Compact (opens on Amazon in a new tab)474 × 210 × 427 mm47.4 × 21.0 × 42.7 cm18.7 × 8.27 × 16.8 in
Define C (opens on Amazon in a new tab)440 × 210 × 399 mm44.0 × 21.0 × 39.9 cm17.3 × 8.27 × 15.7 in
Nano400 × 203 × 330 mm40.0 × 20.3 × 33.0 cm15.7 × 7.99 × 13.0 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: R4 56.3 litres, Compact 42.5 litres, Define C 36.9 litres, Nano 26.8 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
R456.3 litres2.1×
Compact (opens on Amazon in a new tab)42.5 litres1.6×
Define C (opens on Amazon in a new tab)36.9 litres1.4×
Nano26.8 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Nano.