paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thermaltake Core V1 vs NR200P vs Core 500 vs X300 size comparison

This comparison shows 4 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Thermaltake Core V1 (276 × 316 × 260 mm), NR200P (292 × 376 × 185 mm), Core 500 (203 × 367 × 250 mm) and X300 (155 × 80.0 × 155 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Thermaltake Core V1 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)276 × 316 × 260 mm27.6 × 31.6 × 26.0 cm10.9 × 12.4 × 10.2 in
NR200P (opens on Amazon in a new tab)292 × 376 × 185 mm29.2 × 37.6 × 18.5 cm11.5 × 14.8 × 7.28 in
Core 500203 × 367 × 250 mm20.3 × 36.7 × 25.0 cm7.99 × 14.4 × 9.84 in
X300 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)155 × 80.0 × 155 mm15.5 × 8 × 15.5 cm6.1 × 3.15 × 6.1 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Thermaltake Core V1 22.7 litres, NR200P 20.3 litres, Core 500 18.6 litres, X300 1.92 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Thermaltake Core V1 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)22.7 litres12×
NR200P (opens on Amazon in a new tab)20.3 litres11×
Core 50018.6 litres9.7×
X300 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)1.92 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, X300.