paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Torrent vs Torrent Compact vs Torrent Nano vs CM NR200P size…

This comparison shows 4 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Torrent (544 × 242 × 530 mm), Torrent Compact (467 × 222 × 450 mm), Torrent Nano (417 × 222 × 374 mm) and CM NR200P (292 × 185 × 376 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Torrent (opens on Amazon in a new tab)544 × 242 × 530 mm54.4 × 24.2 × 53.0 cm21.4 × 9.53 × 20.9 in
Torrent Compact (opens on Amazon in a new tab)467 × 222 × 450 mm46.7 × 22.2 × 45.0 cm18.4 × 8.74 × 17.7 in
Torrent Nano (opens on Amazon in a new tab)417 × 222 × 374 mm41.7 × 22.2 × 37.4 cm16.4 × 8.74 × 14.7 in
CM NR200P (opens on Amazon in a new tab)292 × 185 × 376 mm29.2 × 18.5 × 37.6 cm11.5 × 7.28 × 14.8 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Torrent 69.8 litres, Torrent Compact 46.7 litres, Torrent Nano 34.6 litres, CM NR200P 20.3 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Torrent (opens on Amazon in a new tab)69.8 litres3.4×
Torrent Compact (opens on Amazon in a new tab)46.7 litres2.3×
Torrent Nano (opens on Amazon in a new tab)34.6 litres1.7×
CM NR200P (opens on Amazon in a new tab)20.3 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, CM NR200P.