paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fractal Design Nano S vs CM NR200 vs NZXT H210 size comparison

This comparison shows 3 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Fractal Design Nano S (13.0 × 15.7 × 7.99 in), CM NR200 (13.5 × 16.2 × 7.99 in) and NZXT H210 (13.7 × 14.7 × 8.27 in), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Fractal Design Nano S (opens on Amazon in a new tab)13.0 × 15.7 × 7.99 in33.0 × 40.0 × 20.3 cm13.0 × 15.7 × 7.99 in
CM NR20013.5 × 16.2 × 7.99 in34.4 × 41.2 × 20.3 cm13.5 × 16.2 × 7.99 in
NZXT H210 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)13.7 × 14.7 × 8.27 in34.9 × 37.2 × 21.0 cm13.7 × 14.7 × 8.27 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Fractal Design Nano S 26.8 litres, CM NR200 28.8 litres, NZXT H210 27.3 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Fractal Design Nano S (opens on Amazon in a new tab)26.8 litres1×
CM NR20028.8 litres1.1×
NZXT H210 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)27.3 litres1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Fractal Design Nano S.