paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Nano S vs Node 202 vs Node 304 vs GF N2 size comparison

This comparison shows 4 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Similar comparisons

Size comparison of Nano S (400 × 203 × 330 mm), Node 202 (377 × 82.0 × 330 mm), Node 304 (211 × 249 × 373 mm) and GF N2 (200 × 260 × 320 mm), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Nano S (opens on Amazon in a new tab)400 × 203 × 330 mm40.0 × 20.3 × 33.0 cm15.7 × 7.99 × 13.0 in
Node 202 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)377 × 82.0 × 330 mm37.7 × 8.2 × 33.0 cm14.8 × 3.23 × 13.0 in
Node 304 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)211 × 249 × 373 mm21.1 × 24.9 × 37.3 cm8.31 × 9.8 × 14.7 in
GF N2200 × 260 × 320 mm20.0 × 26.0 × 32.0 cm7.87 × 10.2 × 12.6 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Nano S 26.8 litres, Node 202 10.2 litres, Node 304 19.6 litres, GF N2 16.6 litres
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Nano S (opens on Amazon in a new tab)26.8 litres2.6×
Node 202 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)10.2 litres1×
Node 304 (opens on Amazon in a new tab)19.6 litres1.9×
GF N216.6 litres1.6×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Node 202.