paper credit card wine bottle dollar bill cd mattress soda can pack of playing cards penny quarter

Name this comparison

Saved in this browser. Use Share to get a link.

Common Items:  
Search items others have compared, or look a size up on the web.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Planet vs Belt vs belt II vs Belt III size comparison

This comparison shows 4 objects drawn to scale. Drag the view to rotate it, or add your own items to the comparison.

Size comparison of Planet (2,000 × 2,000 × 2,000 m), Belt (1,995 × 15.0 × 15.0 m), belt II (15.0 × 15.0 × 1,995 m) and Belt III (15.0 × 1,995 × 15.0 m), drawn to scale
Dimensions (height × width × depth)
ObjectAs enteredCentimetresInches
Planet2,000 × 2,000 × 2,000 m200,000 × 200,000 × 200,000 cm78,740 × 78,740 × 78,740 in
Belt1,995 × 15.0 × 15.0 m199,500 × 1,500 × 1,500 cm78,543 × 591 × 591 in
belt II15.0 × 15.0 × 1,995 m1,500 × 1,500 × 199,500 cm591 × 591 × 78,543 in
Belt III15.0 × 1,995 × 15.0 m1,500 × 199,500 × 1,500 cm591 × 78,543 × 591 in
Bounding-box volumes as bars: Planet 8 km³, Belt 448,875 m³, belt II 448,875 m³, Belt III 448,875 m³
Bounding-box volume*
ObjectVolumevs smallest
Planet8 km³17,822×
Belt448,875 m³1×
belt II448,875 m³1×
Belt III448,875 m³1×

* Height × width × depth of the box each object fits in, not the object's own volume. Multiples are against the smallest box here, Belt.